A custom system to review contest videos, verify players, approve entries, and manage prize draws without relying on messy folders and manual spreadsheets.

Sorting through video submissions and folders was tedious and lacked a unified process.
Player entries and approvals were tracked manually, increasing the risk of data loss.
Selecting winners transparently and managing prize distribution required custom manual work every time.
When disputes occurred, it was hard to trace who approved an entry and when.

A central hub to monitor total entries, pending reviews, and active contests.
Why it matters
Gives organizers an immediate view of contest health and moderator workload.

A dedicated page to track all participating users and their total contest submission counts.
Why it matters
Helps organizers quickly identify top participants and monitor engagement levels across the platform.

A robust table featuring filters, user info, course details, video previews, and one-click approve/reject actions.
Why it matters
Allows moderators to process a high volume of entries rapidly from a single screen without losing context.

An admin interface to effortlessly add new golf courses and configure specific holes for upcoming contests.
Why it matters
Makes the system highly adaptable for any future tournament without needing developer intervention.

Automated, fair winner selection from the pool of approved entries.
Why it matters
Removes manual bias and saves time during the most critical part of the contest.

A focused review page featuring a built-in video player alongside all submission metadata and user info.
Why it matters
Moderators can thoroughly evaluate a questionable entry without having to download large media files.
Automatically ingests user video submissions and queues them for moderator review.
A fast, keyboard-friendly interface for reviewing videos and marking them as approved or rejected.
Securely selects winners based on contest rules and approved entry pools.
Logs every action taken by moderators and players to ensure contest fairness.
Every workflow was designed to save moderators time and ensure the contest was completely bulletproof against fraud.
Moderators reviewed submissions in half the time by not having to switch between tools.
Centralized verification meant fewer disputes and zero lost entries.
The system could handle thousands of entries without breaking a sweat or needing more staff.
* The focus was strictly on operational efficiency—replacing scattered, manual tasks with a single, reliable source of truth.
Tech Environment
I built the entire review and management platform from the ground up, focusing heavily on a frictionless moderator experience.
Core Responsibilities
Any business that requires manual review of user-generated content or complex multi-step approvals can benefit from this architecture.